Legal Experts' Outcry: Biden's 11th-Hour Constitutional Revision Condemned As Cynical And Irrelevant

President Biden's last-minute proposal to revise the U.S. Constitution has sparked an outcry among legal experts, who denounced the move as cynical and irrelevant. The proposed amendment, which would give Congress the power to overturn Supreme Court decisions with a simple majority vote, has been widely criticized as an attempt to undermine the Court's independence and erode the separation of powers.

Biden's Proposed Amendment

Biden's proposal, which he unveiled in a speech on the steps of the Supreme Court, would allow Congress to override Supreme Court decisions by passing a joint resolution that is signed by the President. The amendment would apply to all Supreme Court decisions, including those involving fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and due process.

Biden argued that the amendment is necessary to address the "growing threat" posed by the Supreme Court's conservative majority, which he accused of "legislating from the bench" and "undermining the rule of law." He also claimed that the amendment would restore balance to the three branches of government and ensure that the people have a say in how the Constitution is interpreted.

Legal Experts Slam Biden's Proposal

Legal experts from across the political spectrum have condemned Biden's proposal, calling it "a dangerous and unconstitutional power grab." Critics argue that the amendment would give Congress too much power over the judiciary and undermine the Court's role as the final arbiter of the law.

They also point out that the amendment would likely face an uphill battle in Congress, where it would need a two-thirds majority vote to pass. Even if it were to pass Congress, the amendment would then need to be ratified by three-fourths of the states, a daunting task that would likely take years.

Irrelevant To Pressing Issues Facing The Country

Many legal experts also argue that Biden's proposal is irrelevant to the most pressing issues facing the country. They point to the economy, the war in Ukraine, and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as more important concerns that the President should be addressing.

"This is a cynical and irrelevant distraction from the real problems facing the country," said Ilya Shapiro, director of the Cato Institute's Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies. "The President should be focused on addressing the economy, not on trying to rewrite the Constitution."

Conclusion

President Biden's proposed Constitutional amendment to give Congress the power to overturn Supreme Court decisions has been met with widespread criticism from legal experts. Critics argue that the amendment is dangerous, unconstitutional, and irrelevant to the most pressing issues facing the country.

The amendment is unlikely to pass Congress or be ratified by the states. Even if it were to become law, it would likely face legal challenges and could ultimately be struck down by the Supreme Court itself.

Biden's proposal is a misguided attempt to address concerns about the Supreme Court's conservative majority. The better solution is to respect the independence of the judiciary and work through the proper channels to address any perceived problems with the Court's decisions.